[asterisk-dev] Making some changes to chan_sip and wouldlikesomefeedback

[Alejandro Kauffmann]

Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote:
> My only comment is that using "extension" to refer to an entry in the 
> current sip.conf is insane.  SIP devices are not extensions.  They are 
> devices which may or may not have more than one entry in sip.conf (one 
> for each "line"/call appearance).  Perhaps <sip_account>.conf would be a 
> better term.

Agreed "extension" was a poor choice.  We are actually thinking in terms of
devices, but had not considered
multiple appearance devices.  Perhaps <account>.conf (since we are placing
them in a sip directory) or <sip_account>.conf (as suggested) would be more
accurate.