[asterisk-dev] Re: chan_skinny - SCOigo is now TROLLING (jason justman)

[jason justman]

Paul Davidson wrote:
>
>
> Not that I really want to get embroiled in this- but speaking as one 
> who actually *owns* CCM (and has from 3.3 up to now)- Attendant 
> Console is *NOT* a Web application.  It's partially Java based, and 
> uses the cisco TAPI interface to directly control a 79XX series 
> phone.  I can't say I've investigated the actual protocol it uses- 
> *BUT*, I have had shared line appearances on my CCM attached 7960 for 
> the last 3 years ( 3.3.1 up to 4.0.1) - and it has absolutely 
> indicated status of the shared line- 'hints', in current parlance.  So 
> yes, SCCP has supported busy indication for some time now.  I'd stand 
> witness to it- but the technical documentation no doubt exists on it- 
> even if Jeremy's reference might be off.
>
> -pbd
>   
"web application" in the context it's not a physical station sitting on 
my desk.    you are correct, this discussion has seemed to taken more of 
a turn than intenteded, but i believe the original statement was not if 
SCCP had it, but if chan_skinny had it before chan_sccp - the CCM was 
intended to just be regarding who would have a reference implementation.

j