[asterisk-dev] Re: chan_skinny - SCOigo is now TROLLING (jason justman)

[Jeremy McNamara]

jason justman wrote:

> "web application" in the context it's not a physical station sitting 
> on my desk.    you are correct, this discussion has seemed to taken 
> more of a turn than intenteded, but i believe the original statement 
> was not if SCCP had it, but if chan_skinny had it before chan_sccp - 
> the CCM was intended to just be regarding who would have a reference 
> implementation.



SCOgio made the statement: "The skinny protocol does not handle the busy 
status line lamp (hint)."

CVS logs from will show chan_skinny has always been able to tweak the 
'SKINNY_LAMP_*' since the very first commit  - Granted not as shared 
line appearances, but still using the SCCP protocol as its method of 
control,  thus proving SCOigo totally wrong, yet again.




Jeremy McNamara