[asterisk-dev] chan_skinny fixes

Sergio Chersovani mlists at c-net.it
Wed Apr 5 16:14:02 MST 2006


Jeremy McNamara ha scritto:
> Here we go again - how does one function equal 50% of a HUGE patch?    
> One very trivial, very standard function MAY have been used, which 
> still remains to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
If you still talk this way you will never get the authorization to reuse 
the chan_sccp code.

What is your role in the asterisk team/project?

Sergio



More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list