[asterisk-dev] chan_skinny fixes
Sergio Chersovani
mlists at c-net.it
Wed Apr 5 16:14:02 MST 2006
Jeremy McNamara ha scritto:
> Here we go again - how does one function equal 50% of a HUGE patch?
> One very trivial, very standard function MAY have been used, which
> still remains to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
If you still talk this way you will never get the authorization to reuse
the chan_sccp code.
What is your role in the asterisk team/project?
Sergio
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list