[asterisk-dev] chan_skinny fixes

Jeremy McNamara jj at nufone.net
Wed Apr 5 16:04:09 MST 2006


Sergio Chersovani wrote:

> My accusations were right and you should first ask for chan_sccp code 
> reuse in a skinny patch



Here we go again - how does one function equal 50% of a HUGE patch?    
One very trivial, very standard function MAY have been used, which still 
remains to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.



Jeremy McNamara





More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list