[asterisk-dev] chan_skinny fixes

[Andy Powell]

On 03/04/2006 at 12:01 North Antara wrote:

>> As a use of his channel driver I've been more than happy with it, and I'm
>> more than happy for
>> him to maintain it - especially as he seems to understand and apprecaite
>> the importance of
>> backward compatability as a priority, not an annoyance...
>>
>>
>> Andy / ScaredyCat
>>
>
>When you have code in svn - you don't need backwards compatibility.  If
>you want an old version, that's fine, you can check out a specific
>revision of the entire tree.  There is a point where that becomes a
>non-issue.  Of course, that isn't the issue at hand here.

I'm sorry but that is just wrong in so many ways. . version control and backward
compatability are DIFFERENT things.





Andy / ScaredyCat