[Asterisk-Dev] Re: #3986 bounty

[Sherwood McGowan]

Could always call it CVS-featurefreeze...LOL 

->-----Original Message-----
->From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com 
->[mailto:asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Chris Wade
->Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 9:43 AM
->To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
->Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: #3986 bounty
->
->Tony Mountifield wrote:
->> In article 
->> 
-><Pine.LNX.4.44.0509221353360.20166-100000 at kauri.acheron.indranet.co.nz
->> >, Derek Smithies <derek at indranet.co.nz> wrote:
->>> Hi,
->>>  so when are we going to change the name from
->>>
->>> cvs-stable to cvs-snapshot ?
->> 
->> While I understand the criticisms of the name Stable, I don't think 
->> Snapshot is any better; in fact I think it's worse.
->
->Agreed - snapshot is a bad name.
->
->> I'm hard pressed to come up with a better term than Stable, to 
->> describe a Stable, non-changing feature set and 
->configuration files, 
->> where the only code changes are made in order to fix bugs 
->and improve run-time Stability!
->> 
->
->Why not call it cvs-1.0-stability?  It doesn't imply that it 
->is stable, but it does reflect the idea of this branch going 
->towards becoming cvs-1.0-stable...
->
->My $0.02 :)
->
->--
->Christopher L. Wade, CCNA, CCDA, CQS-CIPTES, CQS-CWLSS
->
->_______________________________________________
->Asterisk-Dev mailing list
->Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
->http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
->To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
->   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
->