[Asterisk-Dev] Re: #3986 bounty

Chris Wade clwade at sparco.com
Thu Sep 22 06:43:00 MST 2005


Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0509221353360.20166-100000 at kauri.acheron.indranet.co.nz>,
> Derek Smithies <derek at indranet.co.nz> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>  so when are we going to change the name from 
>>
>> cvs-stable to cvs-snapshot ?
> 
> While I understand the criticisms of the name Stable, I don't think
> Snapshot is any better; in fact I think it's worse.

Agreed - snapshot is a bad name.

> I'm hard pressed to come up with a better term than Stable, to describe a
> Stable, non-changing feature set and configuration files, where the only
> code changes are made in order to fix bugs and improve run-time Stability!
> 

Why not call it cvs-1.0-stability?  It doesn't imply that it is stable, 
but it does reflect the idea of this branch going towards becoming 
cvs-1.0-stable...

My $0.02 :)

-- 
Christopher L. Wade, CCNA, CCDA, CQS-CIPTES, CQS-CWLSS




More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list