[Asterisk-Dev] need some suggestions

[Gregory Junker]

My reply is somewhat off-topic to the thread, but....IPv6 is an answer 
to a problem that no longer exists...kinda like satellite phones when 
cell phones were just hitting critical mass. IPv6, while still 
sophisticated, has been marginalized by the fixes to NAT issues (such as 
NAT-T and even technologies like UPnP).

Greg

Andrew Lindh wrote:
> IPv6 is a nice toy...I've had servers and a network (BGP, TB application, DNS,
> etc) running for years and no one cares....Adding IPv6 support to an existing
> application is not that hard. There are tools that will convert or inform
> you what needs to be updated for socket access. Then some additional code
> to deal with IPv6 in config files and you are done. Ok, it's not that simple
> but it's not an world changing project that would help all of us...
> 
> 
> T.38 fax with asterisk, Cisco PRI gateway (or local PRI card), and ATAs
> would mean asterisk is a much more complete VoIP package for business.
> But that's not enough for a major project! Fax to e-mail and e-mail to
> fax should be part of the asterisk application package too. That way
> asterisk would have complete real and virtual fax support....
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>From: "Matthew Boehm" <mboehm at cytelcom.com>
>>Personally, I vote for Fax over T.38....
> 
> 
>>From: "Xenith Panacea" <xenythpanacea at gmail.com>
>>
>>>I'm a Software Engineering final term student & along with my 3 ogher
>>>group members, we're planning to work on asterisk for our degree
>>>project.....
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>