[Asterisk-Dev] Zap show channels bug?
Pertti Pikkarainen
ppik at lanwan.fi
Tue Jul 1 23:11:16 MST 2003
'show channels' has also a problem related to this. It is very often
showing wrong numbers.
Those are numbers that have been active some time earlier.
And these are the same incorrect extension numbers that 'zap show
channels' show.
In other words ...
When you see numbers in inactive channels with 'zap show channels',
you can expect to see those incorrectly in 'show channels' as well.
--Pertti
Mark Spencer wrote:
>Actually, "zap show channels" was Matt Fredrickson's project before he
>left for his Mormon mission. He should be finishing his two year mission
>next March, so it might get completed then, or possibly earlier if someone
>wants to actually determine what would be useful info to display and make
>a patch :)
>
>Mark
>
>On 1 Jul 2003, Steven Critchfield wrote:
>
>
>
>>Just so you know you aren't alone. I have similar things happening on my
>>system. I'm not sure how useful it is. I have used it to see what my
>>high water mark is.
>>
>>I'm guessing in channels/chan_zap.c around either line 1590 or 1680
>>there needs to be a line added to set p->exten = NULL.
>>
>>Steven
>>
>>On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 17:13, John Todd wrote:
>>
>>
>>>This odd output has always been the case on my particular systems,
>>>and only now am I starting to think that something is amiss with the
>>>"zap show channels" display:
>>>
>>>gw3*CLI> zap show channels
>>>Chan. Num. Extension Context Language MusicOnH
>>> 1 1410985012 pri-inboun
>>> 2 1410985012 pri-inboun
>>> 3 1301531972 pri-inboun
>>> 4 1410985012 pri-inboun
>>> 5 1410985012 pri-inboun
>>> 6 pri-inboun
>>> 7 pri-inboun
>>> 8 pri-inboun
>>> 9 pri-inboun
>>> 10 pri-inboun
>>> 11 pri-inboun
>>> 12 pri-inboun
>>> 13 pri-inboun
>>> 14 pri-inboun
>>> 15 pri-inboun
>>> 16 pri-inboun
>>> 17 pri-inboun
>>> 18 pri-inboun
>>> 19 pri-inboun
>>> 20 pri-inboun
>>> 21 pri-inboun
>>> 22 pri-inboun
>>> 23 pri-inboun
>>>gw3*CLI>
>>>
>>>There are _no_ active channels on this PRI (yes, I am _absolutely_
>>>sure.) This output, however, is confusing - why does it show that
>>>certain Zap channels have calls? When there is a call on Zap/1-1,
>>>the output is identical.
>>>
>>>JT
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Asterisk-Dev mailing list
>>>Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
>>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>>>
>>>
>>--
>>Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Asterisk-Dev mailing list
>>Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>>
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Dev mailing list
>Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list