[Asterisk-bsd] Zaptel BSD 1.4 for Asterisk 1.4

[Vince Vielhaber]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Yuri wrote:

>> Once it compiled and I loaded it, zttool showed no alarms on my x100p
>> (or x101p, whatever it is).  But asterisk fails configure saying my
>> version of zaptel is too old - I just got it from svn, so there's still
>> another problem.
>>
>> Strangely enough, during configure it gives me this:
>>
>> checking for ZT_TONE_DTMF_BASE in zaptel.h... no
>> checking for ZT_DIAL_OP_CANCEL in zaptel.h... yes
>>
>> right before it errors and a grep of /usr/local/include/zaptel shows
>> ZT_TONE_DTMF_BASE in there and set - probably a #define taking it out
>> 'cuze there is not another zaptel.h anywhere it'd look.  If anyone has
>> a fix for that before I find it, it'd be appreciated.
>
> That svn revision You use? In old revision (may be prior 94) defination
> of ZT_TONE_DTMF_BASE was masked from asterisk by #ifdef _KERNEL directive.
> Now I compile asterisk-1.4.0 w/zaptel from trunk and zaptel-1.4 branch
> without any problem.
>
> But make sure, that You have new header files zaptel.h and tonezone.h in
> /usr/local/include/zaptel directory. And use new ztcfg from ./ztcfg
> directory.

I got it compiled but after further review I noticed that chan-zap wasn't
built.  I then created the dir /usr/local/include/zaptel and moved both
zaptel.h and tonezone.h into it.  Did a distclean and configure on 
asterisk and all appeared to be well.

Then I started compiling and got about 40 errors for codec-zap.c that
looks like at least most of them are caused by struct zt_transcode_header
not being declared anywhere.  A recursive grep did find it in at least
one zaptel.h in a branch but not in trunk or the installed zaptel.h.

Should I be using something other than trunk or should I add the missing
struct declaration to zaptel.h?

Vince.
-- 
   Michigan VHF Corp.   http://www.nobucks.net/   http://www.coloser.com/
            Bringing the world a little coloser to your business