[Asterisk-bsd] zttest on TDM400P

Bill Harris harrisb at rcisd.org
Fri May 6 20:50:57 CDT 2005


Where did you find this rev?   I've tried ports, and the
zaptel page?

Bill


On May 6, 2005, at 7:39 PM, Chris St Denis wrote:

> 0.9_1 is the current version of zaptel for freeBSD
>
> seems stable for me with a 4 digium port pri card.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-bsd-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-bsd-bounces at lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Bill Harris
> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 3:55 PM
> To: Asterisk on BSD discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-bsd] zttest on TDM400P
>
>
> Is there a fix to the zaptel 0.8 code to address the
> machine hangs on interrupt?    I've installed the patch
> that was posted back in March.
>
> OS:	5.3-RELEASE
> Zaptel 0.8   and nightly both hang on zttest, or OS shutdown...
>
> Is the 400P stable under FreeBSD 5.3?
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> On May 1, 2005, at 9:41 AM, Lane wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 01 May 2005 07:39, Kim Culhan wrote:
>>> --- Matt Riddell <matt.riddell at sineapps.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> After seeing a post from someone in the Asterisk users list on the
>>>> topic
>>>> of frame slips with the TDM400P, it turns out that he isn't getting
>>>> them
>>>> on FreeBSD.
>>>>
>>>> Any chance some other people could run zttest and post back the
>>>> results?
>>>>
>>>> Most Linux systems are getting less than 100% at the moment (albeit
>>>> not
>>>> by much).
>>>>
>>>> What do you guys get?
>>>
>>> I put a post on the Asterisk list yesterday with the output of
>>> zttest -v, showing nothing but:
>>>
>>> 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000%
>>>
>>> When running this on another machine which is running asterisk
>>> compiled from the same source, the results are not quite as good
>>> showing 100.000000% on 59 of 60 passes. The exception showing
>>> 99.987793%
>>>
>>> Should the test be run over a span of several minutes ? Hours ?
>>>
>>> There are differences in the machines, a slower cpu in the case
>>> above among others..
>>>
>>> Soo.. what do others get?
>>>
>>> -kim
>>>
>> I get 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% on a Dell SC420
>> with
>> 128Meg o' Ram, Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.53GHz (2527.01-MHz 686-class
>> CPU) on
>> FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5 #0
>>
>> He only runs asterisk so 128Meg seems to be fine for now.
>>
>> lane
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-BSD mailing list
>> Asterisk-BSD at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-BSD mailing list
> Asterisk-BSD at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-BSD mailing list
> Asterisk-BSD at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd



More information about the Asterisk-BSD mailing list