[Asterisk-bsd] zttest on TDM400P

[Chris St Denis]

Ports.

make sure you cvsup your ports tree, I belive it came out like a week or 2
ago.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Harris" <harrisb at rcisd.org>
To: "Asterisk on BSD discussion" <asterisk-bsd at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-bsd] zttest on TDM400P


> Where did you find this rev?   I've tried ports, and the
> zaptel page?
>
> Bill
>
>
> On May 6, 2005, at 7:39 PM, Chris St Denis wrote:
>
> > 0.9_1 is the current version of zaptel for freeBSD
> >
> > seems stable for me with a 4 digium port pri card.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: asterisk-bsd-bounces at lists.digium.com
> > [mailto:asterisk-bsd-bounces at lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Bill Harris
> > Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 3:55 PM
> > To: Asterisk on BSD discussion
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-bsd] zttest on TDM400P
> >
> >
> > Is there a fix to the zaptel 0.8 code to address the
> > machine hangs on interrupt?    I've installed the patch
> > that was posted back in March.
> >
> > OS: 5.3-RELEASE
> > Zaptel 0.8   and nightly both hang on zttest, or OS shutdown...
> >
> > Is the 400P stable under FreeBSD 5.3?
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
> > On May 1, 2005, at 9:41 AM, Lane wrote:
> >
> >> On Sunday 01 May 2005 07:39, Kim Culhan wrote:
> >>> --- Matt Riddell <matt.riddell at sineapps.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> After seeing a post from someone in the Asterisk users list on the
> >>>> topic
> >>>> of frame slips with the TDM400P, it turns out that he isn't getting
> >>>> them
> >>>> on FreeBSD.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any chance some other people could run zttest and post back the
> >>>> results?
> >>>>
> >>>> Most Linux systems are getting less than 100% at the moment (albeit
> >>>> not
> >>>> by much).
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you guys get?
> >>>
> >>> I put a post on the Asterisk list yesterday with the output of
> >>> zttest -v, showing nothing but:
> >>>
> >>> 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000%
> >>>
> >>> When running this on another machine which is running asterisk
> >>> compiled from the same source, the results are not quite as good
> >>> showing 100.000000% on 59 of 60 passes. The exception showing
> >>> 99.987793%
> >>>
> >>> Should the test be run over a span of several minutes ? Hours ?
> >>>
> >>> There are differences in the machines, a slower cpu in the case
> >>> above among others..
> >>>
> >>> Soo.. what do others get?
> >>>
> >>> -kim
> >>>
> >> I get 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% on a Dell SC420
> >> with
> >> 128Meg o' Ram, Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.53GHz (2527.01-MHz 686-class
> >> CPU) on
> >> FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5 #0
> >>
> >> He only runs asterisk so 128Meg seems to be fine for now.
> >>
> >> lane
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Asterisk-BSD mailing list
> >> Asterisk-BSD at lists.digium.com
> >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-BSD mailing list
> > Asterisk-BSD at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-BSD mailing list
> > Asterisk-BSD at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-BSD mailing list
> Asterisk-BSD at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
>