[Asterisk-bsd] zttest on TDM400P

[Chris St Denis]

0.9_1 is the current version of zaptel for freeBSD

seems stable for me with a 4 digium port pri card.

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-bsd-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-bsd-bounces at lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Bill Harris
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 3:55 PM
To: Asterisk on BSD discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-bsd] zttest on TDM400P


Is there a fix to the zaptel 0.8 code to address the
machine hangs on interrupt?    I've installed the patch
that was posted back in March.

OS:	5.3-RELEASE
Zaptel 0.8   and nightly both hang on zttest, or OS shutdown...

Is the 400P stable under FreeBSD 5.3?

Bill



On May 1, 2005, at 9:41 AM, Lane wrote:

> On Sunday 01 May 2005 07:39, Kim Culhan wrote:
>> --- Matt Riddell <matt.riddell at sineapps.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> After seeing a post from someone in the Asterisk users list on the
>>> topic
>>> of frame slips with the TDM400P, it turns out that he isn't getting
>>> them
>>> on FreeBSD.
>>>
>>> Any chance some other people could run zttest and post back the
>>> results?
>>>
>>> Most Linux systems are getting less than 100% at the moment (albeit
>>> not
>>> by much).
>>>
>>> What do you guys get?
>>
>> I put a post on the Asterisk list yesterday with the output of
>> zttest -v, showing nothing but:
>>
>> 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000%
>>
>> When running this on another machine which is running asterisk
>> compiled from the same source, the results are not quite as good
>> showing 100.000000% on 59 of 60 passes. The exception showing
>> 99.987793%
>>
>> Should the test be run over a span of several minutes ? Hours ?
>>
>> There are differences in the machines, a slower cpu in the case
>> above among others..
>>
>> Soo.. what do others get?
>>
>> -kim
>>
> I get 8192 samples in 8191 sample intervals 99.987793% on a Dell SC420 
> with
> 128Meg o' Ram, Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.53GHz (2527.01-MHz 686-class 
> CPU) on
> FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5 #0
>
> He only runs asterisk so 128Meg seems to be fine for now.
>
> lane
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-BSD mailing list
> Asterisk-BSD at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-BSD mailing list
Asterisk-BSD at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd