[asterisk-biz] Asterisk Performance Results

[Brian West]

The biggest issue is i'm not too inpressed with the max 8cps  
outlined.  If it were more like 30-60 cps I would be a bit more  
impressed as its what you would see in the real world.

/b

On Nov 16, 2007, at 8:16 PM, Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:

>
>
> On 11/17/07, Zoa <zoachien at securax.org> wrote:
> I would like to comment on my own post, unlike signate before in  
> 2006 ,
> according to their pdf they did do their homework and used a setting  
> new
> to sipp: :make pcapplay"instead of the echo mode. which should fix  
> that,
> and reinvite is set to no, so i cannot find any flaws in the test  
> setup,
> however i would still like to see pps measurements, i still can't
> believe linux can handle that amount of packets per second in  
> userlevel
> on that type of hardware. (based on my own measurements from years ago
> on a dual xeon - not dual core)
>
>
> the 5140 is a woodcrest, while its a xeon its slightly different  
> from other xeons.  It can do that level (even the 2.0Ghz one has  
> done more than that, which is what I got over a year ago now).   If  
> you look, as I pointed out in a different email, the bandwidth used  
> on the asterisk server section (page 48-50) is at most 16MB or  
> 128Mbps, if you were to divide that down to packets you would see  
> something about like 80k pps or one roughly every 750 usec (T1 does  
> 1 every 125usec).  Unless I did something wrong in my math, I think  
> its doable.
>
>
> -- 
> Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com     Bret McDanel
> Belfast +44 28 9099 6461        US +1 516 687 5200
> http://www.trxtel.com the phone company that pays you!  
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-biz mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz