[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.2.18, Cisco 79XX not registering

[Kai-Uwe Jensen]

Did this fix make it into 1.8.4? Getting registration errors on Cisco 79XX
in 1.8.4, going back to 1.8.3.3 everything works. I did open
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=19264 and included a SIP trace.


On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Julian Lyndon-Smith <asterisk at dotr.com>wrote:

> It was my problem ;)
>
> https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18951
>
> fixed in svn
>
> On 6 May 2011 16:45, Steve Davies <davies147 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 6 May 2011 16:30, Eric Wieling <EWieling at nyigc.com> wrote:
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> >>> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
> >>> Cassius Smith
> >>> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 11:23 AM
> >>> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> >>> Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6.2.18, Cisco 79XX not
> >>> registering
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>> I have a production server running with about 90 Cisco
> >>> 79[46]1's and SIP release 8.5(2)SR1 from last year. I was
> >>> running Asterisk 1.6.2.9 and upgraded last night after hours.
> >>> (Seemed low risk to me!)
> >>>
> >>> Much to my surprise, not a single one of the Cisco 79XX
> >>> phones would register. Since it's a production server, I
> >>> rolled back to 1.6.2.9 and everything was fine. All my
> >>> Linksys SPA phones and Polycom speaker phones registered just fine.
> >>>
> >>> I am now setting up  test servers with both 1.6.2.18 and
> >>> 1.8.3.3 to collect some debug.
> >>>
> >>> I am just curious - has anyone else had SIP issues with these
> >>> phones and updating Asterisk broke them?
> >>>
> >>> I will post results of my findings after I have time to collect them.
> >>>
> >>> Cassius Smitha
> >>>
> >>
> >> I seem to recall this issue mentioned on asterisk-dev.  Check
> issues.digium.com and see if there is anything similar to your issue.
> >>
> >
> > I also remember this being mentioned - I believe it was fixed in the
> > chan_sip Via: header handling code. The fix is in branches/1.6.2
> > already, so you should be able to grab the patch without too much
> > trouble.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Steve
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110510/f9ab03a6/attachment.htm>