[asterisk-users] What is the most stable version of asterisk?

[Steve Totaro]

1.2 is not active either.

Both are solid.

I am loving SNOM phones and OpenVPN software.  Only port(s) open is what I
assign to OpenVPN.

CallWeaver was way ahead of asterisk at the time but you are right it died.

Generally, the newer, the worse.  1.2 was very solid except for a few
strange things that could be worked around.

Newer versions have are like Fedora Core (or FC X) you are just testing beta
software for Digium's commercial products.

Thanks,
Steve Totaro

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Douglas Mortensen <doug at impalanetworks.com
> wrote:

> Based on the following URL, it seems that CallWeaver may not still be an
> active project??
>
> http://www.callweaver.org/blog/20
>
> From a security standpoint, I would usually expect it is safer to be with
> an active project, than a dead one. Otherwise who is going to patch
> vulnerabilities? Not me. I'm not a software developer.
> -
> Doug Mortensen
> Network Consultant
> Impala Networks
> P: 505.327.7300
> .
>
> From: Steve Totaro [mailto:stotaro at totarotechnologies.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:11 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] What is the most stable version of asterisk?
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Douglas Mortensen <
> doug at impalanetworks.com> wrote:
> 1.2? 1.4? 1.6? 1.8?
>
> Thanks,
> -
> Doug Mortensen
> Network Consultant
> Impala Networks Inc
> CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+
> Linux+, Network+, Server+
> .
> www.impalanetworks.com
> P: (505) 327-7300
> F: (505) 327-7545
>
>
> Callweaver?   http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/CallWeaver.  I believe
> they forked somewhere in the 1.2 release.  Many features ahead of Asterisk.
>
> Although I didn't see anything on FreeSwitch stating anything anything
> about deadlocking, I know that was one of the main reasons for BKW, as
> seasoned asterisk developer and folks to start from scratch.  That and the
> hybrid dual license in Asterisk.
>
>
> http://www.sofaswitch.org/docs/How%20does%20FreeSWITCH%20compare%20to%20Asterisk.pdf
>
> Read the whole piece.  I know it isn't Asterisk but BKW who contributed and
> I believe is still helping Asterisk
>
> Besides, I feel that FreeSwitch is the most stable.
>
> I like 1.2 so I went with Callweaver for many installations.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Totaro
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110326/f46caadc/attachment.htm>