[asterisk-users] What is the most stable version of asterisk?

[Douglas Mortensen]

I have been somewhat interested in FreeSwitch in the past, but I am mostly interested in Asterisk. That's why I asked about stability of asterisk versions. Maybe some other time I'll look deeper into FreeSwitch.

Thanks. And thanks everyone for the feedback.
-
Doug Mortensen
Network Consultant
Impala Networks
P: 505.327.7300
.

From: Steve Totaro [mailto:stotaro at totarotechnologies.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:11 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] What is the most stable version of asterisk?


On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Douglas Mortensen <doug at impalanetworks.com<mailto:doug at impalanetworks.com>> wrote:
1.2? 1.4? 1.6? 1.8?

Thanks,
-
Doug Mortensen
Network Consultant
Impala Networks Inc
CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+
Linux+, Network+, Server+
.
www.impalanetworks.com<http://www.impalanetworks.com>
P: (505) 327-7300
F: (505) 327-7545


Callweaver?   http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/CallWeaver.  I believe they forked somewhere in the 1.2 release.  Many features ahead of Asterisk.

Although I didn't see anything on FreeSwitch stating anything anything about deadlocking, I know that was one of the main reasons for BKW, as seasoned asterisk developer and folks to start from scratch.  That and the hybrid dual license in Asterisk.

http://www.sofaswitch.org/docs/How%20does%20FreeSWITCH%20compare%20to%20Asterisk.pdf

Read the whole piece.  I know it isn't Asterisk but BKW who contributed and I believe is still helping Asterisk

Besides, I feel that FreeSwitch is the most stable.

I like 1.2 so I went with Callweaver for many installations.

Thanks,
Steve Totaro
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110325/90f3a833/attachment.htm>