[asterisk-users] benefits of asterisk 1.8

[vip killa]

digium, eat your dog food!

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:08 AM, dotnetdub <dotnetdub at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 3 June 2011 22:41, Hans Witvliet <hwit at a-domani.nl> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 09:07 +0100, Ishfaq Malik wrote:
>> > Are you suggesting that there are no bugs in 1.4 or 1.6?
>>
>> I presume that you are aware of the fact that it is impossible to prove
>> the absence of "bugs" in any piece of software....
>> You might not have detected them yet.
>> Furthermore behaviour that might have been coded on purpose, can be
>> considered "eroneously" some time later.
>>
>> > Currently there seems to be a fear of 1.8. We're about to put it into
>> > production and yes, we've had issues with it, mostly due to the fact we
>> > use RealTime, but before you change anything it is always advisable to
>> > test the hell out of it.
>> >
>> > To anyone who is thinking of moving to 1.8 the question is not, 'is it
>> > stable?'. The question is, 'have I comprehensively tested it to show
>> > that it is suitable for my needs?'
>>
>> If you put it into production, test at least the functions that you are
>> going to use. There might (and probably will) problems in the code, but
>> as long as it does not bother you, so what?
>>
>>
>
> See this thread here about Asterisk 1.8 - and Digium's view on the matter.
>
> http://nerdvittles.com/?p=743
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110605/5d651594/attachment.htm>