[asterisk-users] benefits of asterisk 1.8

[dotnetdub]

On 3 June 2011 22:41, Hans Witvliet <hwit at a-domani.nl> wrote:

> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 09:07 +0100, Ishfaq Malik wrote:
> > Are you suggesting that there are no bugs in 1.4 or 1.6?
>
> I presume that you are aware of the fact that it is impossible to prove
> the absence of "bugs" in any piece of software....
> You might not have detected them yet.
> Furthermore behaviour that might have been coded on purpose, can be
> considered "eroneously" some time later.
>
> > Currently there seems to be a fear of 1.8. We're about to put it into
> > production and yes, we've had issues with it, mostly due to the fact we
> > use RealTime, but before you change anything it is always advisable to
> > test the hell out of it.
> >
> > To anyone who is thinking of moving to 1.8 the question is not, 'is it
> > stable?'. The question is, 'have I comprehensively tested it to show
> > that it is suitable for my needs?'
>
> If you put it into production, test at least the functions that you are
> going to use. There might (and probably will) problems in the code, but
> as long as it does not bother you, so what?
>
>

See this thread here about Asterisk 1.8 - and Digium's view on the matter.

http://nerdvittles.com/?p=743
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110605/91b4535b/attachment.htm>