[asterisk-users] 10.0.0 better than 2.0.0?

[Danny Nicholas]

I thought it was going to be 1.10.0

 

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of vip killa
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 2:48 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] 10.0.0 better than 2.0.0?

 

I agree, the numbering seems to make no sense. Oh well it's just an
arbitrary measurement of non-progress anyway

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Tony Mountifield <tony at mountifield.org>
wrote:

I read Kevin's piece in asterisk-announce about the new numbering scheme,
and saw in svn-commits some tagging of 10.0.0-beta1.

Perhaps I'm thick (I hope not!), but I really can't see why calling the
next version 10.0.0 is any better than calling it 2.0.0!

I'm surprised not to have seen ANY talk in asterisk-users or aserisk-dev
about it, since the announcement.

Cheers
Tony
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
              http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110722/c8cbe61c/attachment.htm>