[asterisk-users] 10.0.0 better than 2.0.0?

[vip killa]

I agree, the numbering seems to make no sense. Oh well it's just an
arbitrary measurement of non-progress anyway

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Tony Mountifield <tony at mountifield.org>wrote:

> I read Kevin's piece in asterisk-announce about the new numbering scheme,
> and saw in svn-commits some tagging of 10.0.0-beta1.
>
> Perhaps I'm thick (I hope not!), but I really can't see why calling the
> next version 10.0.0 is any better than calling it 2.0.0!
>
> I'm surprised not to have seen ANY talk in asterisk-users or aserisk-dev
> about it, since the announcement.
>
> Cheers
> Tony
> --
> Tony Mountifield
> Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
> Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110722/c08c35f9/attachment.htm>