[asterisk-users] Serious bug in 1.6.2.19 - what is the time frame to fix such bugs?

[Bruce B]

Thanks for feedback. Yeah, tell me about it. Your description is very
accurate of the situation. I can't believe it's in the repo without any
tests done; even the simplest reload. I don't mean to be a whiner but
honestly the repo is a joke with such an obvious flaw for so long
now........

On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Vahan Yerkanian <vahan at arminco.com> wrote:

> On 7/30/11 7:39 AM, Bruce B wrote:
>
>> I think this should be a quick fix since it's rendering the latest
>> stable version useless and making the impression that it was released
>> just to break things and force people onto 1.8x. Just a thought...no
>> blame game. But really something like this should be tackled quickly. No
>> point to break things so badly on the last stable version.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
> Confirming this issue on 10+ 1.6.2.19 Asterisk servers. This problem makes
> it difficult to do edits on sip.conf on production systems, as there is ~25%
> chance that you'll crash the server and cut the established calls. The
> problem does not exist in 1.6.2.18...
>
> I think this problem should be fixed or the 1.6.2.19 should be removed from
> the digium repo.
>
> Regards,
> Vahan
>
>
> --
> ______________________________**______________________________**_________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>              http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>  http://lists.digium.com/**mailman/listinfo/asterisk-**users<http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110801/761d202e/attachment.htm>