[asterisk-users] From 1.4 to 1.6.0
Gavin Henry
gavin.henry at gmail.com
Tue May 19 13:00:57 CDT 2009
Is there any document on the reasons for the 1.6.0 and 1.6.1 branches?
I remember reading something but can't find it again.
Was it stability versus new features?
I'm currently playing with 1.6.1
Gavin.
On 19/05/2009, Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet at amorsen.dk> wrote:
> Miguel Molina <mmolina at millenium.com.co> writes:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I was just wondering, does anyone managing production asterisk servers
>> migrated successfully from 1.4.2X to 1.6.0.X? I would like to see if
>> there are some successful cases. Is your 1.6.0.X behaving well, with
>> acceptable stability? Please share your experiences.
>
> Asterisk 1.6.0.5 and 1.6.1.0 are performing acceptably here. The new
> T.38 features are great, and the BLF/hint changes are nice too.
>
> This bug isn't so nice: https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=13623
> We are currently trying the session-timers=refuse workaround.
>
>
> /Benny
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
http://www.suretecsystems.com/services/openldap/
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list