[asterisk-users] Asterisk Segmentation Faults Using Skinny (v1.6.0.10)

[Jonathan Thurman]

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Wayne <Wayne at planetwayne.com> wrote:

>
>
> Hi Steve,
> Thanks for the pointers. I must admit - I was leaning towards 1.6 as
> this apparently has support for SIP over TCP (?). My end goal with this
> was to try and get Asterisk talking to Exchange 2007 servers unified
> messaging.
>

While I haven't used the SIP over TCP in production (yet), I find that the
1.6.1 series is stable for our environment.  I don't know about using
Exchange, as we are staying as far from unified messaging as possible (for
political reasons of course...)  I wouldn't install 1.0, so why go back to
1.2 or 1.4.  Just more to learn and relearn.  The important thing is to have
a test environment to get all of the show stopping buts out.


>
> As for chan_skinny - I'm currently using this on an existing 1.2 server
> although from what I've picked up from previous posts (going back a
> while) the inbuilt version is now quite stable and possibly better than
> the older 'chan_skinny' (which I think the development has stopped for
> now?). This is why I opted to use it for the new 1.6 server.
>

What is the main reason for staying with skinny on these phones?  I have
quite a few 7940/7960 converted to SIP that work great.

Next week I will try and duplicate this behavior on my test system with
skinny, but you should get a bug report filed with the core and important
configurations.

-Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090710/4512916f/attachment.htm