<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Wayne <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Wayne@planetwayne.com">Wayne@planetwayne.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
</div>Hi Steve,<br>
Thanks for the pointers. I must admit - I was leaning towards 1.6 as<br>
this apparently has support for SIP over TCP (?). My end goal with this<br>
was to try and get Asterisk talking to Exchange 2007 servers unified<br>
messaging.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>While I haven't used the SIP over TCP in production (yet), I find that the 1.6.1 series is stable for our environment. I don't know about using Exchange, as we are staying as far from unified messaging as possible (for political reasons of course...) I wouldn't install 1.0, so why go back to 1.2 or 1.4. Just more to learn and relearn. The important thing is to have a test environment to get all of the show stopping buts out.<br>
<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
As for chan_skinny - I'm currently using this on an existing 1.2 server<br>
although from what I've picked up from previous posts (going back a<br>
while) the inbuilt version is now quite stable and possibly better than<br>
the older 'chan_skinny' (which I think the development has stopped for<br>
now?). This is why I opted to use it for the new 1.6 server.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>What is the main reason for staying with skinny on these phones? I have quite a few 7940/7960 converted to SIP that work great.<br></div></div><br>Next week I will try and duplicate this behavior on my test system with skinny, but you should get a bug report filed with the core and important configurations.<br>
<br>-Jonathan<br><br>