[asterisk-users] Enterprise or Fedora?

[Jaswinder Singh]

I prefer CentOS barebone install and yumming the way up for dependencies but
manually compile asterisk/zaptel . Ubuntu servers are pretty good too since
its repositories are quite bigger compared to CentOS .

On Feb 2, 2008 11:45 PM, shadowym <shadowym at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Actively maintained or actively being broken and fixed with constant
> updates?  Not something suitable for Production IMHO.  Makes more sense
> for
> development and experimentation IMHO.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benny Amorsen [mailto:benny+usenet at amorsen.dk]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 1:54 PM
> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Enterprise or Fedora?
>
> "shadowym" <shadowym at hotmail.com> writes:
>
> > I cannot think of a single reason to use Fedora for a production
> anything
> > when there are alternatives like CentOS.  Fedora is bleeding edge stuff
> and
> > constantly changing.
>
> The advantage of Fedora is that it is very actively maintained -- and
> asterisk is only a yum install asterisk away!
>
>
> /Benny
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080203/fa9ba9e7/attachment.htm