I prefer CentOS barebone install and yumming the way up for dependencies but manually compile asterisk/zaptel . Ubuntu servers are pretty good too since its repositories are quite bigger compared to CentOS .<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Feb 2, 2008 11:45 PM, shadowym <<a href="mailto:shadowym@hotmail.com">shadowym@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Actively maintained or actively being broken and fixed with constant<br>updates? Not something suitable for Production IMHO. Makes more sense for<br>development and experimentation IMHO.<br><div class="Ih2E3d"><br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Benny Amorsen [mailto:<a href="mailto:benny+usenet@amorsen.dk">benny+usenet@amorsen.dk</a>]<br>Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 1:54 PM<br>To: <a href="mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com">asterisk-users@lists.digium.com</a><br>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Enterprise or Fedora?<br><br></div><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">"shadowym" <<a href="mailto:shadowym@hotmail.com">shadowym@hotmail.com</a>> writes:<br><br>> I cannot think of a single reason to use Fedora for a production anything<br>
> when there are alternatives like CentOS. Fedora is bleeding edge stuff<br>and<br>> constantly changing.<br><br>The advantage of Fedora is that it is very actively maintained -- and<br>asterisk is only a yum install asterisk away!<br>
<br><br>/Benny<br><br><br><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<br>asterisk-users mailing list<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>