[asterisk-users] libpri and NT-Point to multi-point

[Olivier]

Hello Andrew,

2008/12/17 Andrew Thomas <andy at datavox.co.uk>

> If you are connecting to BRI lines then you should be TE - not NT.


Yes of course, you're right.

I was mostly referring to this :
ISDN ------<BRI> ---- asterisk -----<BRI>----- legacy PBX

Then, in this case, as legacy PBX has a set of TE-PtmP or TE-PtP interfaces,
asterisk box should also include such NT-PtP or NT-PtmP interfaces.

For instance, would you say that in the UK, most PBXes are using TE-PtP ?

>
>
> You can run as TE ptp or ptmp with mISDN (not sure about DAHDI yet - not
> tried the new release).
>
> HTH
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:
> asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Olivier
> Sent: 17 December 2008 08:14
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: [asterisk-users] libpri and NT-Point to multi-point
>
> Hi,
>
> At the moment, libpri /w Asterisk 1.6, Dahdi 2.1, is not supporting
> NT-Point to multi-point mode.
> Here (France), most small PBXes are connected to ISDN through BRI trunks in
> PtmP (don't know why but it seems the general case).
> So this NT-PtmP function would be very helpful to easily slide an Asterisk
> box between an existing PBX and the network.
>
> Does the same case apply elsewhere (UK, Germany, Italy, ...) ?
> Do you think this is needed ?
>
> Regards
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081217/586c4ac4/attachment.htm