[asterisk-users] Help with Asterisk to Huawei SoftX3000 registry problem
Alex Balashov
abalashov at evaristesys.com
Tue Aug 19 08:08:46 CDT 2008
On Tue, August 19, 2008 8:48 am, Nestor A. Diaz wrote:
> Philipp Kempgen wrote:
>> Did you enable pedantic=yes in sip.conf?
>>
> thank you very much for your help, it fix the problem.
>
> Is there any other issue that i have to take in mind for placing calls ?
> is there any option for set up pedantic for selected peers ? i use
> broadvoice too and it requires pedantic=no on the configuration:
> http://www.broadvoice.com/support_install_asterisk.html , how can
> coexist this two peers on just one asterisk ?
The 'pedantic' option forces meticulous checks of syntactical traits in the
Call-ID and SIP header organisation that are permitted by the RFC (and
therefore, required to be supported on an RFC-compliant UA like Asterisk)
but are extremely uncommon. Because these traits are uncommon, checking
for them lexically under most imaginable circumstances adds a slight
performance penalty and is wholly unnecessary.
Examples include the largely braindead notion espoused in the BNF that the
header names, values and delimeters can span multiple lines (i.e. with
multiple inline newline characters), although the reasons why anyone would
actually do this, ever, are unclear.
Leave it to Huawei, I guess.
The option can coexist in Asterisk with two different peers because the
option is peer-specific in this context, so it's just like any other
option that is also particular to certain peers.
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list