[asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk Faxing Support

[Steve Underwood]

Justin Newman wrote:
> We have considered working on this. T38 is a short term solution, though.
>
> Justin Newman
>   
Why would it be interesting to you to implement T.38? It seems you are 
also someone who doesn't disclaim code and get it into SVN.

Steve

> ------------------------------
>
> From: Tomislav Par?ina <tparcina at lama.hr>
> Subject: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk Faxing Support
>
> In article <23fd749a0702050057l24216509yb87879ba8c48f676 at mail.gmail.com>, joakimsen at gmail.com says...
>   
>> Asterisk 1.2 has no support of t.38 whatsoever, the call will drop
>> before t.38 is ever utilised, not even pass-thru.
>>
>> 1.4 Adds support for T.38 pass through only and no other sort of
>> faxing, the endpoint must support T.38 and you must send your call to
>> a T.38 gateway and you must not use NAT anywhere in  your network and
>> you must enable re-invites which could cause CDRs not to reflect the
>> true details of the call.
>>
>> Asterisk/Digium also has no interest in any further interest in
>> expanding T.38 or faxing support in Asterisk.
>>
>> Steve Underwood and the other fine persons that have helped to develop
>> the software DSPs and other stuff required for FoIP support also have
>> no interest in writing any further faxing support for Asterisk (RxFax,
>> TxFax + the newest span_dsp wont even compile, much less work under
>> Asterisk any more) probably because they know it will never be
>> included into the Asterisk code.
>>     
>
> Someone please tell me this isn't truth.
>
>