[asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk Faxing Support

Justin Newman nt_jnewman at yahoo.com
Thu Feb 8 09:08:54 MST 2007


We have considered working on this. T38 is a short term solution, though.

Justin Newman

------------------------------

From: Tomislav Par?ina <tparcina at lama.hr>
Subject: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk Faxing Support

In article <23fd749a0702050057l24216509yb87879ba8c48f676 at mail.gmail.com>, joakimsen at gmail.com says...
> Asterisk 1.2 has no support of t.38 whatsoever, the call will drop
> before t.38 is ever utilised, not even pass-thru.
> 
> 1.4 Adds support for T.38 pass through only and no other sort of
> faxing, the endpoint must support T.38 and you must send your call to
> a T.38 gateway and you must not use NAT anywhere in  your network and
> you must enable re-invites which could cause CDRs not to reflect the
> true details of the call.
> 
> Asterisk/Digium also has no interest in any further interest in
> expanding T.38 or faxing support in Asterisk.
> 
> Steve Underwood and the other fine persons that have helped to develop
> the software DSPs and other stuff required for FoIP support also have
> no interest in writing any further faxing support for Asterisk (RxFax,
> TxFax + the newest span_dsp wont even compile, much less work under
> Asterisk any more) probably because they know it will never be
> included into the Asterisk code.

Someone please tell me this isn't truth.




 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list