[Asterisk-Users] RE: Call being answered,
but no audio on either end
Gene Willingham
gwillingham at comcast.net
Tue Jun 14 18:13:22 MST 2005
I think I found the source of this. Been tracing it for a week. Look in
sip.conf. It appears the definition of localnet has a bearing on how some
sip devices handle invites and NAT.
I had changed the localnet to 192.168.3.0, but did not change the netmask.
localnet=192.168.3.0/255.255.0.0; All RFC 1918 addresses are local networks
When I changed the netmask to 255.255.255.0 the problem appeared to go away.
It appears the more restrictive localnet the better results at handling sip
devices behind NAT devices.
Gene
> 19. Call being answered, but no audio on either end
> (Intermittent) (Geoff Manning)
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:30:31 -0400
> From: Geoff Manning <gmanning at zoom.com>
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Call being answered, but no audio on
either
> end (Intermittent)
> To: "Asterisk Users (E-mail)" <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Message-ID:
> <D1696C471C6CD511A0BE00D0B7A932DE0957C97C at southe01.zoomtel.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> The best type of error possible, intermittent.
>
> We have PSTN numbers being switched to SIP then forwarded to our Asterisk
> server which sits inside our LAN
>
> Every once and a while (maybe 1 out of every 20 calls) goes like this:
>
> -- Executing Answer("SIP/213.199.36.50-0818e3e8", "") in new stack
> -- Executing Ringing("SIP/213.199.36.50-0818e3e8", "") in new stack
> -- Executing Dial("SIP/213.199.36.50-0818e3e8", "ZAP/g1/:8213") in new
> stack
> -- Called g1/:8213
> -- Zap/1-1 answered SIP/213.199.36.50-0818e3e8
> -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1'
> == Spawn extension (from-gv-uk, 441252580625, 3) exited non-zero on
> 'SIP/213.199.36.50-0818e3e8'
>
> Looks normal right? During this whole exchange, neither side can hear the
> other. Not even a ringing sound.
>
> The above looks no different than the successful calls.
>
> Has anyone seen this type of behavior before?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> ------------------------------
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list