[Asterisk-Users] Is there a Caller ID issue in the latest CVSStable

[Chris Wade]

Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Chris Wade wrote:
> 
>> If you check out 1.0.5 from CVS right now, you'll get 1.0.5 + the 
>> changes that will be part of 1.0.6.  The are two ways to get 1.0.5 as 
>> it was released back on XYZ date, first is to download one of the 
>> 1.0.5 tarballs, the other is to download the CVS 1.0.5 telling CVS to 
>> pull the source AS OF that XYZ date.
> 
> 
> No, that is _not_ correct.
> 
> If you do a CVS checkout and specify "v1-0", you will get the _current 
> 1.0 branch_. This means you will get the latest 1.0 stable official 
> release, plus any changes that have been made since then but not 
> released yet.
> 
> If you do a CVS checkout and specify "v1-0-5", you will _always_ get 
> 1.0.5, regardless of any changes that have been made since then.
> 
> There is never any need to tell CVS to pull by date unless you are 
> trying to track down a particular problem; that is why the CVS tree is 
> "tagged" with these branch/tag identifiers.

I stand corrected, sorry for the mis-information.

-Chris