[Asterisk-Users] Is there a Caller ID issue in the latest CVSStable

[Kevin P. Fleming]

Chris Wade wrote:

> If you check out 1.0.5 from CVS right now, you'll get 1.0.5 + the 
> changes that will be part of 1.0.6.  The are two ways to get 1.0.5 as it 
> was released back on XYZ date, first is to download one of the 1.0.5 
> tarballs, the other is to download the CVS 1.0.5 telling CVS to pull the 
> source AS OF that XYZ date.

No, that is _not_ correct.

If you do a CVS checkout and specify "v1-0", you will get the _current 
1.0 branch_. This means you will get the latest 1.0 stable official 
release, plus any changes that have been made since then but not 
released yet.

If you do a CVS checkout and specify "v1-0-5", you will _always_ get 
1.0.5, regardless of any changes that have been made since then.

There is never any need to tell CVS to pull by date unless you are 
trying to track down a particular problem; that is why the CVS tree is 
"tagged" with these branch/tag identifiers.