[Asterisk-Users] h323 vs oh323

[isamar at isamarmaia.org]

Ok. I will give one more shot on that. Last time I had one-way-audio issue 
with that. Thanks.

Isamar


On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Boris Bakchiev wrote:

> No, max we used is 30 channels.
>
> But according to voip-info its faster protocol because it offloads media
> processing to asterisk (which is a better choice I think) and only looks
> after H323 call setup.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
> isamar at isamarmaia.org
> Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2005 11:28
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] h323 vs oh323
>
>
>
> Ok.. how many channels are you using? More than 100?
> Maybe it can be good only for 10 or 20 simultaneous connections...
>
> Isamar
>
>
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Boris Bakchiev wrote:
>
>> I like the chan_ooh323.
>> I like the idea of selfcontained H323 channel that doesn't rely
> external
>> libraries, often with specific versions that conflict with something
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>