[Asterisk-Users] h323 vs oh323

[Boris Bakchiev]

No, max we used is 30 channels.

But according to voip-info its faster protocol because it offloads media
processing to asterisk (which is a better choice I think) and only looks
after H323 call setup.



-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
isamar at isamarmaia.org
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2005 11:28
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] h323 vs oh323



Ok.. how many channels are you using? More than 100?
Maybe it can be good only for 10 or 20 simultaneous connections...

Isamar


On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Boris Bakchiev wrote:

> I like the chan_ooh323.
> I like the idea of selfcontained H323 channel that doesn't rely
external
> libraries, often with specific versions that conflict with something