[Asterisk-Users] Strange Quality problems with Asterisk, Gentoo, Redhat and Kernels - /dev/dsp

[Deon Rodden]

I used portage only for the dependencies, which did include libpri, 
zaptel and asterisk 0.9.0; But I then used CVS to download the latest 
zaptel/libpri/asterisk and then did make install for libpri and zaptel 
and make upgrade for Asterisk.

I looked in /usr/lib for libpri and saw the date was the day I compiled 
the CVS version. I also checked out 
/lib/modules/linux-2.4.26-gentoo/misc/ and saw that zaptel and others 
were the same compile date as the CVS (ie, 10 minutes ago). So they are 
being updated. I even rebooted the server to ensure the loading of the 
newest modules/drivers.

The mpg123 that came with portage was the 's' version, but I manually 
downloaded and compiled the 'r' version, so that was fixed already. I'll 
look into the moh patch, is moh far superior, as far as quality, to 
mpg123? Any benefits of moht vs sticking with the tried, proven and 
trusted mpg123 version 'r'?


I'm getting really frustrated with this Simulated Voice T1 quality 
issue. If anybody wants to help me diagnose it, or confirm whether they 
see it, I can give them an iax account on the server and they can call 
into the did that an automated attendant answers, you should be able to 
hear the quality problem.

Kevin P. Fleming wrote:

> Michael Bielicki wrote:
>
>> even better, use anthm's moh patches and don't use mpg123 at all
>
>
> And where would one find these patches? I don't see them in Mantis.
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> .
>