[Asterisk-Users] UK (British Telecom) Caller ID again

Patrick Lidstone (Personal e-mail) patrick at lidstone.net
Tue Sep 28 08:33:44 MST 2004


Thanks Edward, Ian et al.

I'm getting warmer. With Edwards:

Cidsignalling=v23
Cidstart=polarity
Usecallerid=yes

I now see:

    -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1'
Sep 28 14:47:35 NOTICE[19476]: chan_zap.c:5119 ss_thread:  Got event 17
(Event 1
7)...
    -- Detected ring pattern: 332,0,0
 Sep 28 14:47:41 WARNING[19476]: chan_zap.c:5190 ss_thread:  CallerID
returned w
ith error on channel 'Zap/4-1'
     -- Executing Dial("Zap/4-1", "zap/1&zap/2&zap/5|120|Ttr") in new
stack
     -- Called 1
     -- Called 2
     -- Called 5
    -- Zap/1-1 is ringing
    -- Zap/2-1 is ringing
    -- Zap/5-1 is ringing
    -- Zap/1-1 is ringing
    -- Zap/2-1 is ringing
    -- Zap/5-1 is ringing
Sep 28 14:47:42 WARNING[19476]: chan_zap.c:3404 zt_handle_event:  Didn't
finish
Caller-ID spill.  Cancelling.
     -- Zap/1-1 is ringing

There's no obvious clue as to what is causing the error. Sometimes there
is no error reported immediately after the ring pattern detect, and I
just see the later caller-id spill lines. I currently have rxgain=10,
but commenting that out and restarting doesn't seem to make any
difference. Any more ideas? Here is my current zapata.conf in part:

[channels]
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
language=en
usecallerid=yes
cidsignalling=v23
cidstart=polarity
ukcallerid=yes
busydetect=yes
busycount=5
callprogress=yes
rxgain=10
;
; Analogue phone interface
mailbox=3001 at intern
context=intern
signalling=fxo_ks
callerid="3001"
channel=>1
;
;
mailbox=3002 at default
context=intern
signalling=fxo_ks
callerid="3002"
mailbox=3002 at intern
context=intern
signalling=fxo_ks
callerid="3002"
channel=>2
;
;
signalling=fxs_ks
context=main-line-7711
usedistinctiveringdetection=yes
dring1=247,159,0
dring1context=dummy
;
channel=>3
;
;
signalling=fxs_ks
context=main-line-5555
channel=>4
;

PS. Telappliant will supply TDM400's in the UK, but do not supply FXO
modules because "they haven't been certified". Cost wise, there isn't a
big difference between Telappliant and going direct to digium, and
digium was, ironically, faster (for me).

Patrick




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list