[Asterisk-Users] What about a higher level configuration language
Brian Capouch
brianc at palaver.net
Sun Sep 26 12:41:55 MST 2004
Dinesh Nair wrote:
> On 27/09/2004 00:50 Jay Milk said the following:
>
>> Eliminating the need to specify (and keep track of) priorities would
>> make changes to extensions.conf much easier to implement.
>
>
> or perhaps allow non-consecutive priorities.
>
After this topic was discussed a bit at the developer's confab, I got to
thinking about what a great feature that would be.
Renumbering priorities is a sadly common task for me in my somewhat
chaotic config environment, and having a way to "sneak in" actions in
between existing ones would be a major win.
Of course, the problem of the hard-coded "priority + 101" situation is
problematical. I say we think through what the perfect world would look
like in this respect and then see how hard it would be to implement. . .
B.
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list