[Asterisk-Users] What about a higher level configuration language

Brian Capouch brianc at palaver.net
Sun Sep 26 12:41:55 MST 2004


Dinesh Nair wrote:
> On 27/09/2004 00:50 Jay Milk said the following:
> 
>> Eliminating the need to specify (and keep track of) priorities would
>> make changes to extensions.conf much easier to implement.
> 
> 
> or perhaps allow non-consecutive priorities.
> 

After this topic was discussed a bit at the developer's confab, I got to 
thinking about what a great feature that would be.

Renumbering priorities is a sadly common task for me in my somewhat 
chaotic config environment, and having a way to "sneak in" actions in 
between existing ones would be a major win.

Of course, the problem of the hard-coded "priority + 101" situation is 
problematical.  I say we think through what the perfect world would look 
like in this respect and then see how hard it would be to implement. . .

B.



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list