[Asterisk-Users] [patch] allow the transfer keys from app_dial's't' and 'T' and hangup key 'H' to be configured via features.conf

[Josh Roberson]

Yeah, sorry i kinda jumped the gun on ya there..    I plan to update it 
again pretty soon, but just for future reference, they normal method to 
apply a patch would be to use the patch command, as follows:

patch -p0 < patch.txt

usually this is done from the top-level source directory for the package 
you are trying to patch, replacing patch.txt with the name of the diff 
(patch).   Sometimes patch makers don't use paths in their patch, so you 
kinda have to know where the files are that you're trying to patch, but 
i try to make mine all work against the top-level source directory.

twisted

box100 wrote:

>Wow, you guys are fast. My apologies, twisted. I realize there must have been a reason why it wasn't marked "resolved" and included in the CVS HEAD, but I was under the impression that those who wanted to and have the knowhow could download and apply the patch. Didn't mean to imply you or anyone else *stated* that it was finished, it just seemed from the dialog in the bug report that work on it had been completed and just not marked as such. My mistake.
> 
>It will be great when it is done whenever that happens since the added functionality really will increase the usefulness of Asterisk as a PBX.
> 
>Thanks for the speedy reply.
> 
>Roger
>
>________________________________
>
>From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com on behalf of Josh Roberson
>Sent: Tue 9/7/2004 00:28
>To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] [patch] allow the transfer keys from app_dial's't' and 'T' and hangup key 'H' to be configured via features.conf
>
>
>
>Roger,
>
>    at no point did I say I was finished with this patch.   I did get a
>little frustrated early on in the development.   Currently this patch is
>broken due to recent changes in cvs, and I'm about to tag it with a
>post-1.0 tag in the bugtracker since there seems to be lots of interest
>in it's existance, but it needs a little work.   Please do not make
>assumptions as you have below,   because I am the author of this patch,
>and I do *NOT* feel as though i'm finished, nor did i say so anywhere in
>the bugnotes.
>
>Thanks.
>twisted
>  
>