[Asterisk-Users] incoming number truncated

[Oliver Breidenbach]

Update:

editing "channels/chan_zap.c" and setting "#define DEFAULT_CIDRINGS 2" 
and recompile seems to have fixed the problem although it still shows 
only the higher 6 numbers in the CLI console...

Very, very, very esoteric.

Cheers,

Oliver.


On 07.09.2004, at 01:30, Oliver Breidenbach wrote:

> Peter,
>
> thanks for trying to help.
>
> I've enabled overlap dialing with no effect.
>
> "pri intense debug span 1" gives this output:
>
> < Informational frame:
> < SAPI: 00  C/R: 1 EA: 0
> <  TEI: 000        EA: 1
> < N(S): 102   0: 0
> < N(R): 105   P: 0
> < 41 bytes of data
> -- ACKing all packets from 104 to (but not including) 105
> -- Since there was nothing left, stopping T200 counter
> -- Stopping T203 counter since we got an ACK
> -- Nothing left, starting T203 counter
> < Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8)  len=41
> < Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 102/0x66) (Originator)
> < Message type: SETUP (5)
> < [04 03 90 90 a3]
> < Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1  Q.931 Std: 0  Info transfer 
> capability: 3.1kHz audio (16)
> <                              Ext: 1  Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, 
> circuit-mode (16)
> <                              Ext: 1  User information layer 1: A-Law 
> (35)
> < [18 03 a9 83 81]
> < Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1  IntID: Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, 
> Exclusive Dchan: 0
> <                        ChanSel: Reserved
> <                       Ext: 1  Coding: 0   Number Specified   Channel 
> Type: 3
> <                       Ext: 1  Channel: 1 ]
> < [1e 02 80 83]
> < Progress Indicator (len= 4) [ Ext: 1  Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard 
> (0) 0: 0   Location: User (0)
> <                               Ext: 1  Progress Description: Calling 
> equipment is non-ISDN. (3) ]
> < [6c 0b 21 83 38 39 38 39 34 33 39 39 30]
> < Calling Number (len=13) [ Ext: 0  TON: National Number (2)  NPI: 
> ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1)
> <                           Presentation: Presentation allowed of 
> network provided number (3) '123456789' ]
>
> =================================================================^
> I changed this number to protect privacy. But it is 9 digits and it is 
> correct.
> =================================================================
>
> < [70 07 c1 38 34 30 30 35 33]
> < Called Number (len= 9) [ Ext: 1  TON: Subscriber Number (4)  NPI: 
> ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '876543' ]
>
> =================================================================^
> I also changed this. len=9 should mean 9 digits, right? the number i 
> dialed is "87654321", the "21" is missing.
> =================================================================
>
>     Sending Receiver Ready (103)
> > [ 02 01 01 ce ]
> > Supervisory frame:
> > SAPI: 00  C/R: 1 EA: 0
> >  TEI: 000        EA: 1
> > Zero: 0     S: 0 01: 1  [ RR (receive ready) ]
> > N(R): 103 P/F: 0
> > 0 bytes of data
> -- Restarting T203 counter
> -- Restarting T203 counter
> > [ 00 01 d2 ce 08 02 80 66 02 18 03 a9 83 81 ]
> > Informational frame:
> > SAPI: 00  C/R: 0 EA: 0
> >  TEI: 000        EA: 1
> > N(S): 105   0: 0
> > N(R): 103   P: 0
> > 10 bytes of data
> -- Restarting T203 counter
> Stopping T_203 timer
> Starting T_200 timer
> > Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8)  len=10
> > Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 32870/0x8066) (Terminator)
> > Message type: CALL PROCEEDING (2)
> > [18 03 a9 83 81]
> > Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1  IntID: Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, 
> Exclusive Dchan: 0
> >                        ChanSel: Reserved
> >                       Ext: 1  Coding: 0   Number Specified   Channel 
> Type: 3
> >                       Ext: 1  Channel: 1 ]
>     -- Accepting call from '123456789' to '876543' on channel 0/1, 
> span 1
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Oliver.
>
>
> On 07.09.2004, at 00:51, Peter Svensson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Oliver Breidenbach wrote:
>>
>>> We are calling from a number in the same local area code and there
>>> seems to be only the 6 most significant numbers of the target adress
>>> arrive in Asterisk.
>>>
>>> For example, we are calling 99999123 and the CLI shows only the 
>>> 999991
>>> and tries to match that with a extension rule.
>>>
>>> (We've set up a rule for _99999XXX with StripMSD(5) and a rule for
>>> extension 123.)
>>>
>>> The strange thing is that if I dial the number with the area code 
>>> (i.e.
>>> 089/99999123) or from a mobile fone it works and properly connects to
>>> the correct extension.
>>
>> Perhaps the rest of the number is sometimes sent as overlap digits? 
>> Try
>> doing "pri intense debug span XXXX" and see if there are additioal 
>> digits
>> coming in as overlap. Or try enabling overlap dialing for that span.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-Users mailing list
>> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users