[Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems
Eric Wieling
eric at fnords.org
Wed Apr 21 12:16:04 MST 2004
It would be VERY nice if TxFax exited with a non-zero return code if the
fax was not actually sent. In the case of the problem with sending to
the Canon fax machine, this always returns "0":
$status = $AGI->exec("TxFAX", "$fax_filename|caller");
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 12:46, Eric Wieling wrote:
> Almost all of our fax machines are Canon, so it's kinda tough to test
> TxFax.
>
> On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 11:35, Serge Oleinikov wrote:
> > Hi Eric !
> > I have the same problem with Canon fax mashine as you have. I have wrote an
> > email to Steve (developer of spandsp) some weeks ago and got no answer how
> > to fix the problem :(
> > Looks like connection was dropped by fax mashine without any reason
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Eric Wieling" <eric at fnords.org>
> > To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 6:19 PM
> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems
> >
> >
> > > I'm getting the following when sending to a specific fax machine. Any
> > > ideas?
> > >
> > > File name is '/var/spool/asterisk/email2fax/7F2SOeYJiU.tif'
> > > Changed from phase 0 to 2
> > > Slow carrier up
> > > Slow carrier down
> > > Slow carrier up
> > > <<< NSF: 20 00 00 11 80 00 8a 49 10 53 54 49 52 4c 49 4e 47 20 43 4f 56
> > > 49 4e 47 54 00 67 00 80 80 80 0c 01 02
> > > NSF without final frame tag
> > > The remote is made by 'Canon'
> > > <<< DIS: 80 20 ee 88 c4 80 95 80 80 80 38
> > > DIS with final frame tag
> > > In state 10
> > > DIS:
> > > V.8 capable
> > > Preferred octets: 256
> > > Can receive fax
> > > Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
> > > R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK
> > > 2D coding OK
> > > Scan line length: 215mm
> > > Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
> > > Receiver's minimum scan line time: 20ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
> > > Error correction mode
> > > T.6 coding
> > > R8x15.4lines/mm OK
> > > R16x15.4lines/mm and/or 400x400pels/25.4 mm OK
> > > Metric-based resolution preferred
> > > Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
> > > North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm)
> > > North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)
> > > Single-progression sequential coding (Rec. T.85) basic
> > > DCS:
> > > Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
> > > 2D coding OK
> > > Scan line length: 215mm
> > > Recording length: A4 (297mm)
> > > Minimum scan line time: 20ms
> > > Start sending document
> > > Start tx document - compression 2
> > > Fine mode
> > > Changed from phase 2 to 4
> > > Sending ident
> > > >>> TSI: 43 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
> > > >>> DCS: 83 00 c4 00
> > > HDLC underflow in state 3
> > > Changed from phase 4 to 6
> > > Changed from phase 6 to 3
> > > Slow carrier up
> > > <<< XCN: fa
> > > XCN with final frame tag
> > > In state 4
> > > Disconnecting
> > > Changed from phase 3 to 7
> > > Changed from phase 7 to 8
> > >
> > > --
> > > Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
> > > "In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
> > > upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss."
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
--
Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
"In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss."
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list