[Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems

[Eric Wieling]

Almost all of our fax machines are Canon, so it's kinda tough to test
TxFax.

On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 11:35, Serge Oleinikov wrote:
> Hi Eric !
> I have the same problem with Canon fax mashine as you have.  I have wrote an
> email to Steve (developer of spandsp) some weeks ago and got no answer how
> to fix the problem :(
> Looks like connection was dropped by fax mashine without any reason
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Eric Wieling" <eric at fnords.org>
> To: <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 6:19 PM
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems
> 
> 
> > I'm getting the following when sending to a specific fax machine.  Any
> > ideas?
> >
> > File name is '/var/spool/asterisk/email2fax/7F2SOeYJiU.tif'
> > Changed from phase 0 to 2
> > Slow carrier up
> > Slow carrier down
> > Slow carrier up
> > <<< NSF: 20 00 00 11 80 00 8a 49 10 53 54 49 52 4c 49 4e 47 20 43 4f 56
> > 49 4e 47 54 00 67 00 80 80 80 0c 01 02
> > NSF without final frame tag
> > The remote is made by 'Canon'
> > <<< DIS: 80 20 ee 88 c4 80 95 80 80 80 38
> > DIS with final frame tag
> > In state 10
> > DIS:
> > V.8 capable
> > Preferred octets: 256
> > Can receive fax
> > Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
> > R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK
> > 2D coding OK
> > Scan line length: 215mm
> > Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
> > Receiver's minimum scan line time: 20ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
> > Error correction mode
> > T.6 coding
> > R8x15.4lines/mm OK
> > R16x15.4lines/mm and/or 400x400pels/25.4 mm OK
> > Metric-based resolution preferred
> > Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
> > North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm)
> > North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)
> > Single-progression sequential coding (Rec. T.85) basic
> > DCS:
> > Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
> > 2D coding OK
> > Scan line length: 215mm
> > Recording length: A4 (297mm)
> > Minimum scan line time: 20ms
> > Start sending document
> > Start tx document - compression 2
> > Fine mode
> > Changed from phase 2 to 4
> > Sending ident
> > >>> TSI: 43 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
> > >>> DCS: 83 00 c4 00
> > HDLC underflow in state 3
> > Changed from phase 4 to 6
> > Changed from phase 6 to 3
> > Slow carrier up
> > <<< XCN: fa
> > XCN with final frame tag
> > In state 4
> > Disconnecting
> > Changed from phase 3 to 7
> > Changed from phase 7 to 8
> >
> > -- 
> >           Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
> > "In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
> > upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss."
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
          Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
"In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss."