[Asterisk-Users] Stupid Newbie Questions
Steven Critchfield
critch at basesys.com
Tue Dec 16 22:19:19 MST 2003
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 22:32, TkVoice Author wrote:
> Thanks TC
>
> I will check this out.
>
> I did notice 1 error if anyone is concerned:
>
> I patched against asterisk-v0.5.0 and I got this result:
You probably need to be at a more current version than 0.5.0, and you
should be concerned that the offsets are so far off since this means
there was major changes since the diff was made.
> patch -p0 < distinctiveringpatch.diff
>
> patching file asterisk/channels/chan_zap.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 134 (offset -1 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 317 (offset -6 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 381 (offset -1 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 504 (offset -14 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 3869 (offset -96 lines).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 4387 (offset -18 lines).
> Hunk #7 FAILED at 4416.
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 4368 (offset -98 lines).
> Hunk #9 succeeded at 5256 (offset -55 lines).
> Hunk #10 succeeded at 5240 (offset -100 lines).
> Hunk #11 succeeded at 6786 (offset -210 lines).
> Hunk #12 succeeded at 6976 (offset -100 lines).
> Hunk #13 succeeded at 7254 (offset -221 lines).
> Hunk #14 succeeded at 7405 (offset -100 lines).
> Hunk #15 succeeded at 7377 (offset -221 lines).
> 1 out of 15 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> asterisk/channels/chan_zap.c.rej
>
> TC wrote:
>
> >You can try this hacking this patch
> >http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000504
> >
> >
--
Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list