[asterisk-dev] New license for db?

[Sergey Tamkovich]

This won't be too hard, since realtime now supports store and destroy 
methods in addition to select and update,
We could simplify code base and give a choice to an end user if we'll 
change astdb with realtime subsystem.
Maybe i'm missing some points here, but i like an idea of realtime 
instead of astdb very much.

Vasil Kolev пишет:
> В 13:51 -0500 на 26.10.2008 (нд), Russell Bryant написа:
>   
>> ----- Johansson Olle E <oej at edvina.net> wrote:
>>     
>>> It seems like Oracle has changed the license for Berkeley DB
>>> http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/berkeley-db/htdocs/oslicense.html
>>>
>>> Does this license work for us? Should we upgrade ast_db?
>>>       
>> If we were going to update astdb, I would rather go with sqlite3.  In
>> fact, most of the work to do this has been done for a long time.  Josh
>> has it sitting in a branch.  I think all that is left is writing a
>> tool to upgrade existing databases, and a final review.
>>
>> If there are reasons to use something else in the upgrade, we should
>> definitely consider them, though.
>>
>>     
>
> How hard would it be to have AstDB use the same mechanism as, for
> example, realtime? Is there a point in two separate database interfaces
> in asterisk, as they will be essentially the same.
>
> Then you can just share drivers between them and set up for example ODBC
> storage for the astDB and postgresql for the realtime, or SQLite for
> both, etc, etc.
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev