[asterisk-dev] New license for db?

[Vasil Kolev]

В 13:51 -0500 на 26.10.2008 (нд), Russell Bryant написа:
> ----- Johansson Olle E <oej at edvina.net> wrote:
> > It seems like Oracle has changed the license for Berkeley DB
> > http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/berkeley-db/htdocs/oslicense.html
> > 
> > Does this license work for us? Should we upgrade ast_db?
> 
> If we were going to update astdb, I would rather go with sqlite3.  In
> fact, most of the work to do this has been done for a long time.  Josh
> has it sitting in a branch.  I think all that is left is writing a
> tool to upgrade existing databases, and a final review.
> 
> If there are reasons to use something else in the upgrade, we should
> definitely consider them, though.
> 

How hard would it be to have AstDB use the same mechanism as, for
example, realtime? Is there a point in two separate database interfaces
in asterisk, as they will be essentially the same.

Then you can just share drivers between them and set up for example ODBC
storage for the astDB and postgresql for the realtime, or SQLite for
both, etc, etc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B0?=
	=?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=B5?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=86=D0=B8=D1=84=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE?=
	=?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0?=
	=?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=87=D0=B0=D1=81=D1=82?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BE=D1=82?=
	=?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=BC=D0=BE=D1=82=D0=BE?=
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20081027/e8134ca3/attachment.pgp