[Asterisk-Dev] stable/feature freeze?

[Russell Bryant]

Jeremy McNamara wrote:
> For once RoyK and me agree on something - I was quite annoyed when I 
> found out that the new branch of code was called 'stable' when it is 
> really just a point in time that was decided that nothing major would be 
> done to that tree and hopefully someday it would become 'stable'.

If I knew a way to make everyone stop referring to it as the "stable" 
branch and just refer to it as the "1.0" branch, then I would happily do 
it.  I agree that "stable" is a bad name, and it just causes stress for 
me.  I maintain the branch on my own, and pretty much the only time 
anyone talks to me about it is when they want to complain about their 
specific problem and want to know why it was a problem in the first 
place, and then why it wasn't fixed yesterday.

Russell