[Asterisk-Dev] Benchmark numbers....

[Brian West]

Obviously if you have 10k users you're not going to use Asterisk at  
all.... but its something to work on.

/b

On May 2, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Michael Giagnocavo wrote:

> Try creating 10K SIP peers, and have SIP use a different peer for  
> each call.
> Even better to do registrations.
>
> In fact, an easy way to test is to just create a bunch of peers on one
> Asterisk box, and then a bunch of register => on another Asterisk  
> box and
> watch the carnage.
>
> -Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Brian West
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 11:22 AM
> To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Benchmark numbers....
>
> Well only 1.  Using sipp with and without media. (which btw Milliwatt
> doesn't send anything so you can't use that to load test with media)
>
> The other tests I'm going to do is a bit more involved.. but I have
> to lab those up and write some stuff to standardize my testing.
>
> /b
>
> On May 2, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
>
>
>> How many SIP peers did you test with?
>>
>> -Michael
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com
>> [mailto:asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Brian  
>> West
>> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 10:44 AM
>> To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Benchmark numbers....
>>
>> This might be true.. thus is why I tested SIP.. maybe this will get
>> someone's eyes open and get IAX fixed.
>>
>> /b
>>
>> On May 2, 2005, at 11:11 AM, Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>> In my testing of CVS-HEAD I can get 5551+ sip "sessions" without
>>>> media on asterisk without a problem.  The load average is around
>>>> 2-3.
>>>>
>>>> On a side note... on my 3ghz P4 HT box I can get 629 ulaw sip calls
>>>> with media (verified) without a problem.  The load average on the
>>>> box
>>>> was around 14 and it still sounded perfect... so if you had a dual
>>>> 3.4 ghz Xeon box you should have ZERO problems doing a DS3 with
>>>> asterisk. (That is if the interrupt is 1000 per second and not  
>>>> 28000
>>>> and its all ulaw)
>>>>
>>>> I'll be doing more testing later this week.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> But the real scalability wall I've seen is number of registered
>>> peers...
>>> That's what takes down a box (at least with IAX). I've heard
>>> reports of a
>>> Dual Xeon 3.2GHz not being able to handle even 1000 IAX peers.
>>>
>>> -Michael
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
>>> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
>>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
>> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
>> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>