[Asterisk-Dev] Benchmark numbers....

[Michael Giagnocavo]

Try creating 10K SIP peers, and have SIP use a different peer for each call.
Even better to do registrations.

In fact, an easy way to test is to just create a bunch of peers on one
Asterisk box, and then a bunch of register => on another Asterisk box and
watch the carnage.

-Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Brian West
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 11:22 AM
To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Benchmark numbers....

Well only 1.  Using sipp with and without media. (which btw Milliwatt  
doesn't send anything so you can't use that to load test with media)

The other tests I'm going to do is a bit more involved.. but I have  
to lab those up and write some stuff to standardize my testing.

/b

On May 2, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Michael Giagnocavo wrote:

> How many SIP peers did you test with?
>
> -Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Brian West
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 10:44 AM
> To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Benchmark numbers....
>
> This might be true.. thus is why I tested SIP.. maybe this will get
> someone's eyes open and get IAX fixed.
>
> /b
>
> On May 2, 2005, at 11:11 AM, Michael Giagnocavo wrote:
>
>
>>> In my testing of CVS-HEAD I can get 5551+ sip "sessions" without
>>> media on asterisk without a problem.  The load average is around  
>>> 2-3.
>>>
>>> On a side note... on my 3ghz P4 HT box I can get 629 ulaw sip calls
>>> with media (verified) without a problem.  The load average on the  
>>> box
>>> was around 14 and it still sounded perfect... so if you had a dual
>>> 3.4 ghz Xeon box you should have ZERO problems doing a DS3 with
>>> asterisk. (That is if the interrupt is 1000 per second and not 28000
>>> and its all ulaw)
>>>
>>> I'll be doing more testing later this week.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> But the real scalability wall I've seen is number of registered
>> peers...
>> That's what takes down a box (at least with IAX). I've heard
>> reports of a
>> Dual Xeon 3.2GHz not being able to handle even 1000 IAX peers.
>>
>> -Michael
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
>> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev